A group of general state lawyers is preparing to sue to stop Elon Musk’s “Doge” team to enter data in the US Treasury Department, calling it a flagrant violation of US law.
“This level of access to unauthorized individuals is illegal, unprecedented and unacceptable,” New York Prosecutor General Letitia James said on Thursday.
James is leading a coalition of 14 lawyers general of the democratic state from jurisdictions including Arizona, California and Nevada. Their judicial proceeding will seek to ban the unofficial Department of the Efficiency of the Musk (DOGE) from access to payment systems to the Treasury Department, which includes the bank account and social security data.
NY Lettitia James Prosecutor General (Photo by Rochlin/Getty Images for (BAM) Brooklyn Academy of Music)
Musk has protected the approach, saying that the goal of the DOGE – an office within the executive branch created by President Trump through the executive order – is to identify and stop the government’s remains.
However, the effort has sparked major controversy, partly because Musk’s employees-a group of 19-24-year-old-has been accessible to the most sensitive US data in a growing number of government agencies without passing through intimacy and Federal security reviews.
In response, Ag James accused Musk of acting on the law. “The president does not have the power to donate our private information to anyone who chooses, and he cannot cut federal payments approved by Congress,” she says.
“Doge has no authority to access this information, which they clearly demanded to block critical payments that millions of Americans rely on payments that support health care, child care and other essential programs,” James added Referring to Dog’s attempt to close spending at the US International Development Agency (USAID).
Recommended by our editors
The trade union groups representing federal employees have filed their own lawsuit, claiming that the DEGE’s approach to the Treasury Department violates the federal law by allowing them to see sensitive data of Americans without their consent. “Pensioners, taxpayers, federal employees, companies and other individuals from all spheres of life are not assured that their information will receive the protection that federal law offers,” the lawsuit states.
The White House claims that Dog’s employees had “only for reading” access to sensitive data, meaning they could not make changes. But Wire reports that Musk employees installed “had the ability to rewrite the payment system code”. On Thursday, US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly restricted access to the payment system for two employees with a capacity for reading only, Wall Street Journal Reports. One of those employees, Marko Elez, resigned later that day after WSJ discovered a trove of racist posts on an X account deleted now.
Musk is now attacking the journalist who wrote the story about Elez, suggesting that her previous work for USAID is “perhaps criminal”, and sharing posts they call WSJ “Completely compromised.” He is also voting his followers X if Elez has to return to his post. As for this article, nearly 80% of about 288,000 accounts they have voted say yes.
Like what you are reading?
register Good time Bulletin for our high stories of intimacy and safety was submitted the right to your box.
This bulletin may contain advertising, agreement or cooperation links. By clicking the button, you confirm that you are 16+ and agree with our use conditions and privacy policy. You can subscribe from newspapers at any time.
About Michael kan
Old -man
